data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6adaf/6adafe767f8ff2f4f792e9f2f156f3032dd8fb6c" alt=""
Keeping it simple and classic. You really can't build a nicer bike than this. This color shot is printed on the page preceding the feature.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47239/4723932dcbe678fa291c5f60067365c260c4d36e" alt=""
1969 and already considered as done like "the good old days".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a1d9/2a1d90d523e29f059160e2c8e45913dc8b9e703a" alt=""
Nice shot/stance. Note that the copy states, styled as a perfect "1960" chopper. The term bobber was not, and really should not be used for bikes like this. Some might prefer a side mounted light and plate and although the caption implies otherwise, side mounts were run well before 1960.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1d3b/f1d3bd053ee9545baa5e6260e7817d49392b27a2" alt=""
The copy shouldn't say "74" in regards to the "XA" springer. My guess, they're referring to it as having a 1" stem thus fitting a "74" . Back then "74" was commonly used to mean big twin. Interesting how XA forks were considered rare even back then. It was a lot tougher to find parts before the internet. Hell, in 69 there probably wasn't a decent MC swap meet anywhere.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4751/d475103ed389603457a20a484ca462c83896bb11" alt=""
Do you really think you could do better? That's a 20" wheel up front. I've only heard mention of one since then, and I think it was on the Born Loser blog.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2247e/2247ef39ae00ad48185185287335d26e2870349e" alt=""
Check how nicely the tanks have been axed to fit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79406/7940636b725bcf6d306c251a1514f24089f8d8ec" alt=""
The copy mentions the dilemma of the 20" tire. (Note: a 21" is not mentioned as a replacement as they were beginning to be considered a bit "out" in '69). The bike is so well balanced that a 19" might be too small and a 21" too big. That said, I'd probably opt for the 21". It's hard to think that $1,700 was considered a lot of bread.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/028f2/028f2eb6f4828be67b224b5509101896b5a555a1" alt=""
From the David Mann Chopper Fest of several years ago. I see several differences, so I'd say it was inspired by, but not the same bike. Behind the bike there appears to be framed pages from a magazine feature. Anybody know the story on this bike?